[
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12003#action_12003
]
Tonny Kohar commented on QI-182:
--------------------------------
Just committed into SVN the Implementation for this.
It is implemented with navigatable link.
To test the link, please use the school example MailServiceComposite, because
that's the only service in the example that have configuration object attached.
Since the name itself is a navigatable link, do I need to remove the "Goto"
button ?
> Service Configuration Tab content
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: QI-182
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-182
> Project: Qi4j
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Envisage
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
> Assignee: Tonny Kohar
> Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> The content on the Configuration Tab for Services should contain the Service
> Configuration names and types.
> The Service Configuration is a "Private Mixin" on the Service Composite of
> type org.qi4j.api.configuration.Configuration. The generic type of that
> Configuration is the custom configuration we want presented. So, you capture
> the Visitor's visit( MixinDescriptor mixinDescriptor ) to find the Mixin type
> of Configuration.
> It seems that currently the only way to proceed would be via
> java.util.reflect, which I think might be a bad idea. Does this mean we need
> to add more things in the visitor pattern?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev