Hi, all!

I was waiting for the 0.6 hoping this will be fixed but not much
changed and there is still a bug in

org.qi4j.index.rdf.assembly.RdfNativeSesameStoreAssembler

it needs EntityTypeSerializer in addition to EntityStateSerializer (at
least in my case there were complaints by qi)

The frustrating thing that even when I add that I still can not get it
to run. The same long trail of exceptions.

Should I just abandon my efforts of trying to make it work? How do you
guys persist? There are no tests doing native configuration. The tests
are only for in-memory configuration and they work if you run a test
where db files are removed on each run, the DB is created (and I guess
this is what updates the index) anew and querying within the same JVM
process (that is what the tests in qi's source-base do) but that is
not exactly how persistence should work IMHO. I should be able to
bring down jvm start a new one and be able to find my old friends.
WDYGT?

Note, also that the above will work and the data is still there on the
consequtive runs but I have to update at least one entity to
recalculate in-memory index. So, maybe I can nudge the indexer to
re-index somehow? Any code sample would be appreciated.

If there is an alternative way to search for entities, I would be
happy to hear about them.

Alternatively maybe someone could take a look at what I got and see if
there is something really obvious that's incorrect (I could zip my
sample up and send it to anyone who might be interested).

Sorry for this long mail and thank you very much for any help.

Cheers,
Alex.


>> My guess is that the indexing files are corrupted somehow. Can you look
>> in /rdf-stores/rdf-indexing and clear those files, and see if that helps?
>
> No, I removed rdf-stores directory and it did not help. Same long
> exception trail.
>
> Is there a functioning test case I can look at? Maybe comparing what's
> working with what I have will clue me in on the differences.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to