Michael Hunger wrote: > Ok, then at least stick with Niclas suggestion of having a class > encapsulating this and not having the MD5 and > UnsupportedEncodingExceptiosn leak into all kinds of types of qi4j ...
Right. But the code refers to "SHA" as the algorithm... my crypto is not up to date, so maybe that is the same as MD5...? /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
