Tonny Kohar wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> Tonny Kohar wrote: >>> Yes, this should be ok. I will look at the code and implement it. >>> >>> And so the same things will be the same for Service usage then ? >> Not sure what you mean... can you explain more? >> > > I mean is the Service Usage tab (only available if the object is > Service type) do the opposite of Dependency Tab. > So if dependency tab will contains things it depends to, then the > Service Usage tab will contains the things it serve to (the opposite > of dependency) and listing all the type that use the current Service. > Otherwise, I wrongly interpret the Service usage tab then.
Oh, right! I forgot about that one. Yes, you are absolutely correct, they are the inverse of each other. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
