Michael Hunger wrote: > Yes I checked it. These are different method instances (unfortunately). > > But as the method count is small we can still loop through the array for > small numbers instead of using HashMap. > > The method hashcode is computed cheaply just class.hashCode() ^ > name.hashCode() but the equals sucks.
What do you mean by method hashcode being class+name? What about parameter types??? /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
