Did you commit that ? My svn still shows revision 9 ?
Michael
Am 12.03.2009 7:03 Uhr, schrieb Rickard Öberg:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> Yes, that makes sense, AND allows for codebase modularity as well,
>> without cyclic dependencies at that level.
>
> For reference, here's my current application assembly of StreamFlow,
> which I think is pretty generic:
> ApplicationAssembly assembly = applicationFactory.newApplicationAssembly();
> assembly.setName("StreamFlow client");
> LayerAssembly uiBuilderLayer = assembly.newLayerAssembly("UI builder");
> LayerAssembly uiControllerLayer = assembly.newLayerAssembly("UI
> controller");
> LayerAssembly uiModelLayer = assembly.newLayerAssembly("UI model");
> LayerAssembly appLayer = assembly.newLayerAssembly("Application");
> LayerAssembly domainLayer = assembly.newLayerAssembly("Domain");
> LayerAssembly domainInfrastructureLayer =
> assembly.newLayerAssembly("Domain infrastructure");
> LayerAssembly appInfrastructureLayer =
> assembly.newLayerAssembly("Application infrastructure");
>
> uiBuilderLayer.uses(uiControllerLayer, uiModelLayer);
> uiControllerLayer.uses(appLayer);
> appLayer.uses(uiModelLayer, domainLayer, appInfrastructureLayer);
> domainLayer.uses(domainInfrastructureLayer);
> ---
> Note that there are TWO infrastructure layers, one for the application
> and one for the domain. The domain infrastructure contains the
> EntityStore for the domain entities, and the application infrastructure
> contains the EntityStore for the application entities. I've chosen to do
> the application state as Entities as well, as that allows me to easily
> persist the "current state" of the application.
>
> /Rickard
>
> _______________________________________________
> qi4j-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
