[
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12090#action_12090
]
Rickard Öberg commented on QI-202:
----------------------------------
I would prefer one tab for API and one for SPI. That makes it clear what they
represent.
Another thing that would be good to have on the Module General tab is what
EntityStore and what EntityFinder is used for entities in it. Right now it's
hard to know exactly what stores and finders are used for specific modules.
> Layer and Module detail tab info
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: QI-202
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-202
> Project: Qi4j
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Envisage
> Reporter: Tonny Kohar
> Assignee: Tonny Kohar
>
> Layer and Module detail tab info.
> So what will be the implementation
> - new tabs (API and SPI)
> - or reuse existing tab (Dependency and ???)
> Mailing list opinion
> "I think this would fall under "Dependencies" (Required and Provided).
> The General tab for a Layer could list Modules present, and for a
> Module could list registered Composites and Objects. Or Not be present
> at all."
> "This is on Module and Layer, so a new pane and then new tabs for "API" and
> "SPI" respectively, would be good."
> WDYT ? which one I should implement ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
