Thanks for clarification,
Georg
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Georg Ragaller <[email protected]> wrote:
Niclas,
since the original Java 1.5 grammar I use, is licensed under the BSD license
(see http://tinyurl.com/javacc-license),
I've left the licensing section of the modified grammar untouched.
Also there's one accompanying java source (RealToken.java), needed by the
scannner. This file has no explicit license section.
Except of the package declaration I have not made changes to it.
I've no experience with 'mixing' licenses (my own code will be ASL 2.0
licensed), so is that ok?
I don't know if I can add for example the ASL to the modified grammar,
if the BSD license part is left there.
In Apache, we are allowed to include BSD licensed source code. The
only thing is that we need to put in a attribution in the NOTICE file,
and keep the Copyright headers in the sources. See
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html and
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for more details on how ALv2
projects can (or not) use other licensed software.
Cheers
Niclas
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
