On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:41, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I would suggest that the following are removed in their entirety: > * The Chronos app. Niclas, do you ever see this being finished? If yes, then > I suggest to move it outside of the Qi4j project. If no, then scrap it. Up > to you.
+1 to move it out. > * What is the status of the Struts2 binding? Production quality? If not, > what's left? I think somebody is using this. I'm not sure what other feature is required. > * lib-general: lots of domain-specific stuff. Scrap it, and if we want a > place to put some domain-specific code that can be "reused", then better put > it in a sample app so that people can copy/paste/adapt it. Domain code is > always going to depend on the local usecases! +1 > * lib-quikit: Scrap? Scrap, probably need to rethink what web framework should be used. > * lib-spring: rename to ext-spring, as it is more of an extension than a > library. +1 > * ddd-sample: scrap and re-import the new 1.1 version as there's a LOT of > rewriting in it +1 > * tutorial-cargo: scrap or keep? if keep, then it needs to be updated Keep and make the implementation to be 1-1 with the DDD book. > In short, keep the intros and the composite+service tutorials, fix the > Service tutorial to be complete and add one on Entities. Then we should have > a decent baseline for documentation. +1 > That's about it! I hope noone takes personal offense because of these > suggestions. There's a LOT in the above that is my own code, I should point > out. What I'm concerned with is focus and quality. Better have a lot of > effort on something that is good, rather than a little effort here and there > on stuff that won't work in the end. How about DCI work that both you and Steen are doing? Shouldn't that be part of qi4j codebase? Regards, Edward Yakop _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
