Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/4/3 Niclas Hedhman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > extends AbstractAssociation, Iterable<T> Well, IFF iterator().remove() actually works on the underlying set/list. the iterator contract says "remove" can throw UnsupportedOperationException (as indeed many implementations actually do) because it's an optional method
I think it is implementable.
except that Rickard was talking about wrappers - if these methods provide a wrapper that delegates through to the original object (such as an immutable view) then it should be "asXYZ" if they return mutable _copies_ then "toXYZ" would be more appropriate
It all depends on whether we can implement wrappers or not then. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
