On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> But what about the main idea? For/against? It would make Qi4j inherently > EventSourced, and also almost trivially BASE-oriented. For my own selfish > purposes (as I need scalability + audit logs) that would be very attractive. Much funnier, from an anecdotal point of view; This is very close to how we started out in June/July 2007 when you and I worked on this first time in Örebro. ;-) And, as you noted in the follow-up mail, capturing the 'reads' and some meta-info are also highly desirable for many reasons. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
