Michael Hunger wrote:
I also wanted to suggest that perhaps instead of an xml serialization of value composites JSON may be better suited? Smaller and already using string serialization representation for values.
I think you might be right on this one. Hm.. would we then skip the hashing and go for the plain names instead? Maybe it's better to do the name mungling and schema management on a higher level and keep the data itself simple.
/Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
