Hey,
I have run into a problem with the type resolution algorithm that says
that if I request a Composite (Entity/Value/Composite) given a type,
then if two are found to be matching, then throw an exception. I think
this needs to be modified so that if the type being asked for extends
Composite then an exact match should be made.
Example:
interface Some
{}
interface SomeValue
extends Some,ValueComposite
{}
interface AnotherSomeValue
extends SomeValue
{}
Given the above I want this as result of resolution:
Some -> Ambiguous exception
SomeValue -> SomeValue
AnotherSomeValue -> AnotherSomeValue
Right now I get ambiguous when I ask for SomeValue, as there are two
types that satisfy it. But since I am asking for a specific one, that
one should be returned. Only if I ask for a mixin type should there be
any ambiguity, OR if SomeValue had indeed been registered twice.
Does that sound ok?
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
