On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Rickard Öberg<[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > During the recent Qi4j workshop by the DDD Sweden group a suggestion came up > to rename "SideEffectOf.next" to "SideEffectOf.result". This would more > accurately reflect what it points to, and would also make the Javadoc more > coherent as currently it says: > "Base class for SideEffects. It introduces a typed "next" pointer that > SideEffects can use to get the result of the original invocation." > > If the class introduced a "result" pointer that would be more natural :-)
I have heard similar 'complaints' to the "next" name. "result" is fine with me, since it communicates "no modifications of input" is possible. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
