On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 14:24, Niclas Hedhman<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this will make more sense, BUT it will affect a bunch of
> bootstrapping client code, such as EntityTypeRegistry in another
> package. I still think it is worth the change, as the impact is
> reasonably easy to deal with.
>
>
> WDYT?

+1

Regards,
Edward Yakop

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to