Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I asked the GitHub folks directly what they recommend (see below).
Rickard, do you think you would be able to work in this fashion, i.e.
not committing code directly into the 'main project repo' ??
I am worried about conflict resolution issues, possibly because I have
a lot of bad experience from SVN days.
There are a couple of issues that comes to mind. One is nightmares from
my time working with ClearCase, where all work had to be done in
branches. One week work, one week merging, was the norm. Absolutely
horrible. Also, for the time being I am relying on being able to do
fixes in Qi4j quickly whenever problems arise in the StreamFlow project.
Having more overhead to do that is not helpful.
To turn it around: what are the advantages of working in the outlined
way? What's the big gain by it?
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev