[ 
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702#action_12702
 ] 

Rickard Öberg commented on QI-150:
----------------------------------

Only the first point has been made, since we don't have root tracking. Then 
again, the more I read about aggregates, the less it seems to be required by 
the framework to support it. I think the @Aggregated annotation for removal is 
a good first start, in other words.

> Aggregates
> ----------
>
>                 Key: QI-150
>                 URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/QI-150
>             Project: Qi4j
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: API, Core Runtime
>            Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>            Assignee: Rickard Öberg
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> DDD defines Aggregates as a very central concept, and I think we need to sort 
> this out in Qi4j before hitting a 1.0 release.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to