On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:28 PM, philippe van dyck<[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, but my current implementation includes caching in an expiring map, a
> connection pool, and each operation on a specific reference is queued and
> added in a 'producer' blocking queue emptied by a couple of consumer
> threads...

Sounds more like a production-grade one. I suggest that you commit it
straight into qi4j-extensions. To receive commit rights to platform,
send me a SSH public key in accordance to
http://www.qi4j.org/codebase.html

> Although, each aspect is isolated in a different class/package, do you want
> me to produce a simpler one, more like the one available right now ?

I think not, and instead we can look at the possibility to break out
some of that functionality for generic re-use together and over time.


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to