So, what you are really saying is that the DOM parser in JDK doesn't know of xhtml in itself, and must be 'taught' via DOCTYPE...
Is the XHTML's DOCTYPE definition shipped with the JDK, or does that know become a 'Download' on use issue? Cheers Niclas On Aug 23, 2009 12:22 PM, "Qingyue Zhou" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Niclas, JavaDoc says: "The DOM implementation must have information that says which attributes are of type ID. Attributes with the name "ID" are not of type ID unless so defined. Implementations that do not know whether attributes are of type ID or not are expected to return null." You need define the "Id" first, <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html [ <!ELEMENT html (body) > <!ELEMENT body (ul*) > <!ATTLIST ul id ID #REQUIRED> ]> <html> <body> <ul id="bookings"/> </body> </html> Cheers, Qingyue On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Gang, > I hate XML!! And desperately need someone to assist; > > I got > the following HTML; > <ht... > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > > [email protected]... > _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

