On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> The thing is that Johan wanted to experiment with having the UoW backed > directly by a tx. it has obviously been a long time since we came up with UnitOfWork, that it can be suspended and resumed as well as nested variant. Looking at the code now, I am not totally sure how it was supposed to work (perhaps since the dynamic Visibility issue has been resolved on top of the original work). I also recall that you said that nested uow doesn't work and need to be revisited, and I wonder if it is related to that we are not clear on what the semantics really are. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
