Ok, I found something fishy, dunno if it is the only source of the problem.
In ValueCompositeType : if (!value.getClass().getInterfaces()[0].getName().equals( type.name() )) getInterfaces Javadoc: The order of the interface objects in the array corresponds to the order of the interface names in the *implements* clause of the declaration of the class represented by this object. Or is there an order to follow ? phil Le 7 déc. 2009 à 15:41, philippe van dyck a écrit : > No go. > > I am getting Ambiguous Type Exception out of SerializableType.fromJSon. > > Maybe the real question here is .. why are my value composites serialized in > SerializableType .. and not ValueCompositeType ? > > any clue ? > > phil > > Le 30 nov. 2009 à 12:42, philippe van dyck a écrit : > >> Thanks a lot, I plan to update all qi4j-core and qi4j-extensions later today >> and run a suite of tests. >> >> phil >> >> >> Le 30 nov. 2009 à 12:25, Rickard Öberg a écrit : >> >>> On 2009-11-26 21.11, philippe van dyck wrote: >>>> Thanks Rickard, I am not upgrading to the latest version exactly for >>>> that reason... we already had numerous emails (on the list) regarding >>>> that issue. I am glad it is finally fixed and I will not need to >>>> maintain my patched one anymore. >>> >>> FYI, I just committed this. The change is in the ValueCompositeType class. >>> >>> /Rickard >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> qi4j-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
