On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be Ok if we just make a utility for it instead?
As soon as we do one or the other, we need to ask the question; What about private mixins (those reached by prototypeFor())?? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
