On 2010-02-23 19.27, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I have a vague memory of some bug related to this. But I think there
should exist a testcase if that is a fact, so if it doesn't break any
qi4j-tests/, I think you are Ok to change it.
But I do suspect that there is a deeper problem lurking around,
design-wise I mean.
Alright, I've committed the change, since no testcase broke.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
