On 2010-03-03 07.53, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
StreamFlow is not officially part of Qi4j, which both a good and bad thing. The good side is we don't want to be an umbrella for all Qi4j apps, but the downside is that at the moment it produces a lot of feedback that is discussed and often get incorporate into the Qi4j project, either due to usecase or simply as reusable code, suggestions for improvements, bugs found and so on.
Once we are done with the first phase of the project (next month) I hope we can set up public user/dev lists for StreamFlow (or Streamsource Flow as it will be called then). Then we can separate it a bit more so that discussions happen in the right place.
If you don't know the background, StreamFlow is a joint gov/private/academic project funded by the Swedish government. The software itself does human workflow, with focus on GTD and Systems Thinking. Once this phase is done we will transfer the code into a startup called Streamsource which will continue to develop and market the product. We'll have both Community and Enterprise editions, so that as many as possible can enjoy it :-)
There's a lot of Qi4j-libraries and extensions being built in StreamFlow right now (such as the DCI support and a new web framework as well), which I hope to transfer into Qi4j. I want to keep the infrastructure code in StreamFlow to a minimum, so that we can all share the same foundation for building Qi4j apps.
/Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
