On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, that is true. That would be a nice cleanup of the API actually. I vaguely remember that I investigated that prior to 1.0, but there was some non-trivial dependency somewhere. Can't recall the details... But I don't mind the change if it is possible to do without buggering up the structures. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
