hi, basically, from what i can tell, they claim to have another / new perspective on what the fundamental building block of software should be. (uh huh, all our eyes roll, i know.)
http://blogs.sun.com/laforge49/entry/a_contrary_view might be a better link than what i fwd'd before, i'm still wading through trying to find something clear. whenever i see something that claims to be wonderful, but is explained horribly badly, i suspect it is crap. but these folks seem to have been actually working on making real code, their agilewiki (http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/agilewiki/wiki) looks to be under active development. and the lead dev seems to have real software development chops. so i'm still giving it the benefit of the doubt. sincerely. _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
