On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Le lundi 03 mai 2010 08:07:30, Niclas Hedhman a écrit : >> I am Ok with that, and since the Hazelcast effort is significant step >> forward, I suggest that we make it as "ver 1.1", as it is more than a >> handful of bug fixes. > > The Hazelcast EntityStore is working on simple setups but it still has no fine > configuration and making it work with more than one jvm is quite tricky. In > other words I'm not sure it deserve to be released yet. > > Would things be easier if I move it back to sandbox ?
Well, I think we should increase the visibility and keep it in extensions. Perhaps you add some NOTES on the current status and stuff like that? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
