On 3 May 2010 18:54, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> * Let the enhancer know about special handling of ^java.* package > >> names and stick the result in our own namespace. > > > > I think this should work. IIRC there's a hook for the namespace handling, > so > > it shouldn't be that difficult. > > Ok... I am too nervous about such... > > >> > >> * Change the Lock library to not use the RRWL directly in this fashion. > > Meanwhile, I have removed ReentrantReadWriteLock to be a mixin > directly and put in a small facade. Solves the problem this time... > > Stuart; Good Tip. Sure there won't be some strange problems with such > approach (having $ as first letter in package names)? >
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/lexical.html#3.8 "The Java letters include uppercase and lowercase ASCII Latin letters A-Z (\u0041-\u005a), and a-z (\u0061-\u007a), and, for historical reasons, the ASCII underscore (_, or \u005f) and dollar sign ($, or \u0024). The $ character should be used only in mechanically generated source code or, rarely, to access preexisting names on legacy systems." HTH Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
