Tested and working... thanks.

phil

P.S.: I know it's a pita but what about a 'release' ?

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Philippe Van Dyck <[email protected]> wrote:

> ok sorry, got it, testing with preproduction data right now
>
> phil
>
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Philippe Van Dyck <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I will test it but I can't find it... could you please confirm that it is
>> in the HEAD branch of the git repository ?
>> I suppose that we are talking about changes in NumberType ?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> phil
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Philippe Van Dyck <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> > I use a lot of BigDecimal (it is the base to my Money value).
>>> > Did you push your changes to the code repository yet ?
>>> > Are you sure you could handle it in a compatible way ?
>>>
>>> Pretty sure. There are tests for it as well.
>>>
>>> Since the Object coming into the fromJSON() method in NumberType will
>>> vary from either an Integer, Double or String depending on the size of
>>> the number, I just put in a
>>>
>>> new BigDecimal( "" + json )
>>>
>>> which deals with it correctly.
>>>
>>> It has been committed if you would like to try it out.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> --
>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
>>>
>>> I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
>>> I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
>>> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> qi4j-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to