Rickard,

my own experience with osgi (a couple of years ago) was quite bad regarding
tools support (dev & prod environments).
After trying a couple of "bundles compositions" (including a very
interesting one mixing wicket & osgi) I went back to a simple maven driven
jetty basic servlet container.
Coupled with jrebel (and the maven jrebel plugin), any re-compiled class is
reloaded and if it doesn't work, just type enter in the maven jetty:run and
voilà, a nice and clean restart.
If your CI drives you private repository, you can provision complete
applications easily (i.e.: using profiles).
So if you want an up and running environment with reloading, a quick start
up time and easy reloading... it's the best solution I have composed until
now.


Dunno if it makes sense ;-)

cheers,

phil

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hey,
>
> I'm looking into using GlassFish and OSGi as the runtime environment for my
> Qi4j app. There seems to be a bunch of options available, but here's what I
> have in mind no. Feedback most welcome on whether it makes sense or not.
>
> Basically I want to have one bundle with a BundleActivator that
> instantiates Qi4j and creates the ApplicationAssembly. It will call all my
> assemblers (50+) to "fill in" all the Modules in all the Layers. Those
> assemblers are in other bundles though. The classes in those other bundles
> are referred to by classname so there is no Class.forName() going on.
>
> Once all assemblers have done their thing, the main BundleActivator can
> instantiate and start the application. From here on it's pretty
> straightforward.
>
> The trick is what happens when I redeploy a bundle. My idea is that this
> will cause the application to stop, the bundle redeploys, and then the main
> bundle rebuilds and starts the app again.
>
> The gain is that I don't have to restart the whole server and reload all
> classes and such. The downside is that there will still be some overhead in
> restarting the app instance.
>
> Does that seem to be a reasonable approach? Any other ideas on how to make
> a Qi4j app work in OSGi well?
>
> /Rickard
>
> _______________________________________________
> qi4j-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
>
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to