On 2010-05-18 23.44, Stanislav Muhametsin wrote:
I am leaning on "any leaf" option also, and not only because it's easy
to implement, but because things are just semantically much easier in
that case (headache comes easier if we start matching collection
structure) and requires less "this value most likely means this kind of
behaviour" type of specifying.
I'll implement it for "any leaf" now, in addition with following
constraints:
1. Value of Contains query must be non-collection
2. Value of ContainsAll query must be collection of depth of 1.
If anyone disagrees, please feel free to let me know.
I'm having a hard time seeing what the consequences will be, either way,
so go ahead and do what you feel seems reasonable.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
