Convenience?? On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Stanislav Muhametsin <[email protected]> wrote: > As I'm continuing writing this SQL indexing thing, I came to wonder, is > there any specific reason why both IsNull and IsNotNull predicates exist for > property and association? Because how I see it, IsNull is just negated > IsNotNull and vice versa. Would it be simpler to have just XXXIsNull and > Negation types, instead of Negation, IsNull and IsNotNull? That could > simplify some things at least in query parsing - there would be only one way > to express certain query, and not many, as it is now. > > Oh, and same goes for Equals and NotEquals -predicates. > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
-- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
