Does that mean I can make the Mixin impl methods final?? On 6/7/10, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-06-04 19.46, Stanislav Muhametsin wrote: >> That would be simplest and uniform way, yes. However, sometimes it would >> be useful to provide the programmer with the clear way to bypass the >> possibly performance-costly mixin invocation (in cases of recursion / >> something else). One way to do this would be to make private aliases of >> public methods, however this would work only for mixins which implement >> all the methods of the interface(s). > > Yeah, the best way to do this is to make the method non-public, which > will cause the call to be direct. > > /Rickard > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
-- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
