Hi Rickard,
Thanks for clarifying! I'll avoid ambiguous property naming.
Cheers,
/ Marc
On 28/06/2010, at 12.41, Rickard Öberg wrote:
On 2010-06-24 21.25, Marc Grue wrote:
Given ambiguity of a property name in extended interfaces, should the
EntityBuilder methods instance() and instanceFor() behave like
demonstrated
in the test below? Or are properties simply required not to be
ambiguous?
From a Java point of view the names can be ambiguous, since they are
defined in different interfaces and you can use instanceFor(<type>)
to specify which one you want. However, the current storages don't
store the interface names, and so you would get a clash anyway. I
would suggest not using ambiguous names, in general.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
