On 2010-07-05 18.23, Stanislav Muhametsin wrote:
Quoting Rickard Öberg <[email protected]>:

No, the point is that most organizations *already have* a decision on
JDK version. So when choosing tools, they have to fit into the policy.
Not the other way round.

/Rickard


By my own experience I know what you mean but it doesn't have to work
that way. I believe there are far better methods of handling tools than
enforcing some policy, which changes once in two years, if even then.
But if everyone just conforms with it, the way of doing things will
never change. Oh well, this is getting philisophical again ;)

On a totally unrelated topic, it would be nice to get fixes for QI-255
and QI-256, well QI-256 at least, as it is quite annoying bug.

My problem right now is that Jira is messed up, so I can't access these bugs. Niclas, could you or Peter look into it?

/Rickard

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to