On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Stanislav Muhametsin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Come to think about it, is it possible to make those roles extend just > "Composite" instead of "EntityComposite" or any other types of composites? > But I guess you couldn't add them to assembly then, could you? Correct, the assembly requires concrete Composite subtypes. Personally i have previously viewed your case as "We need a easy mechanism to 'transform' an Entity to a Value.", which in previous reviews have shown to be hard to define in precise terms. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
