I tried to change the test case to the following;
public interface Nameable
{
CapitalizedProperty name();
}
@Concerns( CapitalizeConcern.class )
public interface CapitalizedProperty extends Property<String>
{
@Capitalized
void set( String newValue )
throws IllegalArgumentException, IllegalStateException;
}
But now something else kicks in. In the
AbstractPropertyModel.PropertyHandler#invoke, the logic is
return method.invoke( p, args );
where p is the PropertyInstance assigned as the backer. AND
PropertyInstance.set(T) and CapitalizedProperty.set(String) are not
matching methods, an Exception occurs.
Then I thought; Wait a second, I don't need the annotation;
public interface Nameable
{
CapitalizedProperty name();
}
@Concerns( CapitalizeConcern.class )
public interface CapitalizedProperty extends Property<String>
{
}
Now there are no runtime exceptions, just that the concern is not invoked.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
