On 2010-10-26 18.53, Stanislav Muhametsin wrote:
I tried exporting our database to JSON, and then compared one typical
object before and after QNames. Without: 1240 chars, With: 2920. So
more than double with QNames. I would say that's quite significant.
That's a storage issue. These days, storage size is never really an
issue.
That's an interesting statement that I simply don't agree with. Double
the storage for very little value is not all that tempting.
What do you think about the configuration proposal then?
Why are you having duplicate names in the first place? What's the core
reason for that?
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
