On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> It sort of depends on how you have implemented it. The way I would do it is > to iterate over the value state, and for each property pull it from the > entity. Then it should be no "misses", right? That is not how the withState() functionality works. It calls the StateHolder visitProperties() and on the call back set each property being called-back. Without leveraging that existing functionality (or change it), it is more 'work' and code not being as straight forward. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
