On 2010-12-18 14.20, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
It happens when one Mixin is abstract, and inadvertently inherits the Activatable interface, but has no implementation for it.
Why would it do that?
Well, with this change, my problem is solved and all existing testcases are still working.
That is good, but see above, why are you implementing an interface that is not being implemented? (Since you can't call it anyway)
HOWEVER; When coming to the Swing Tools (Envisage) build, the build system ran out of memory (OoME), which it didn't without this change. Does this indicate some kind of leak that is happening. Is it something need to worry about?
You'd have to do a heap dump (use VisualVM) to find out I think. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
