Ok, I have already forgotten how this is supposed to work ;-) We need release soon...
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have just added a new standard ServiceImporter: ServiceInstanceImporter. > This is the one I described to Niclas some posts ago, where a > ServiceComposite implements ServiceImporter and is delegated to by the > ServiceInstanceImporter. > > Niclas, if you made a local copy, you can change to use this one instead. It > should work well. > > Here's an example of how I use it in my own code: > // Declare the DataSource importing service > module.addServices( DataSourceService.class ).identifiedBy( "datasource" > ).visibleIn( Visibility.application ); > > // Declare a specific DataSource > // It will delegate to "datasource" to do the importing > module.importServices( DataSource.class ). > importedBy( ServiceInstanceImporter.class ). > setMetaInfo( "datasource" ). > identifiedBy( "streamflowds" ).visibleIn( Visibility.application ); > --- > > And that's pretty much it. The main issue right now is that I want to have > ConfigurationComposites per DataSource (in the above example), but they > should be associated with the imported service and yet used by the importer. > This in itself is not a problem, but I haven't figured out how to neatly > export them in JMX so they become available for editing there. To be > improved. > > /Rickard > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
