On 2010-12-30 17.52, Marc Grue wrote:
Is it correctly understood that the concerns we discussed using on
DCI Context methods (for context stacking) wouldn't need private
mixins in the Context object?

Yes.

In that case, would it be possible/reasonable to implement fragment
support for objects _without_ private mixins for the 1.3 release and
postpone support for private mixins to the 1.4 release? (Earger to
streamline our DCI examples to perfection :)

It would be possible, but if we are looking to do private mixins on objects in the future it might be easier to "get it right" from the start, rather than having one strategy first and then changing.

But I agree, I'm also very eager to get those examples nicer.

/Rickard

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to