+1
On 27/01/2011, at 09.48, Rickard Öberg wrote:
> On 2011-01-23 23.24, Marc Grue wrote:
>> I know it's not the default way of organizing things, but if I could
>> choose freely, I would collect things in Qi4j folders like:
>>
>> Mac:
>> configuration={1}/Library/Preferences/*Qi4j*/{0} - most useful here...
>> data={1}/Library/Application Support/*Qi4j*/{0} - maybe?
>> temporary={3}/{0}
>> cache={1}/Library/Caches/*Qi4j*/{0} - maybe?
>> log={1}/Library/Logs/*Qi4j*/{0} - maybe?
>>
>> For instance, my {1}/LIbrary/Preferences/ currently contains 684 items
>> (!) so preferences for my qi4j-apps would be quite dislocated from each
>> other if they where not in a shared Qi4j folder. I think it would be
>> nice to easily be able to locate and inspect all my qi4j-apps (in one
>> place) in the file system too. Or are the FileConfiguration also
>> supposed to be used by non-Qi4j applications?
>>
>> You could potentially have tens of qi4j-applications "spread all over" -
>> personally I would prefer to have their config/support/cache/logs data
>> grouped in Qi4j-folders. Just my 2 cents.
>>
>> Maybe it could be useful for other OS's too?
>
> Well, that is mostly relevant for you as a developer, but for most users it
> wouldn't make any sense at all. I'd prefer to make these things overridable
> on a per-user basis with defaults being as now, if that's ok.
>
> /Rickard
>
> _______________________________________________
> qi4j-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
