Quoting Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>: > I am kind of leaning towards; "Don't bother with this at the moment", > as it is only for the top-level package html that needs to be free of > these javadoc specifics. Once we have figured out how the javadocs are > published, I guess we can pick up the javadoc generated content for > the 'versioned' pages and live with literal "{@link }" in the > 'develop' version.
Ok, that's fine. I'll try to update documentations accordingly in the following days. /Paul _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
