On 5/31/11 2:14 , Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I am ok with this, although the names Event and EventListener needs to be more specific I think.
True. Initially I was considering a more general system, but the first usecase, and maybe only usecase, is for activation events. So if there are no other usecases I'll change the naming to reflect this.
/Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
