+1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > As I go through the Qi4j runtime and re-implement it using functional > programming, I'm realizing that the functional part we have (some of which > is committed, most of which is not), along with the Generic I/O package, > might as well be in its own packages that Core API depend on. I've heard > other requests that for example the I/O stuff should be available without > bringing in the Core API. > > So, I would suggest that we create two new modules in Core, one for the I/O > stuff, and one for the Functional programming parts, which then Core API can > depend on. That way developers can use them without necessarily using the > other parts of Qi4j, if that is their wish. There's no downside for us, > AFAIK, so.. why not? > > /Rickard > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
-- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
