On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> There is a hidden clustermap on our front page, which drives these >> numbers. >> >> Q; Shall we keep it? > > Yes please, looks very interesting!
OK. > I've had a few discussions with Jayway about this, and here are a few > thoughts from that: > * Add the REST library from Streamflow to Qi4j. > * Create a sample web app using the full stack, > * Redo the website, with a new design. > * The recent Scala integration > * ... few low-hanging-fruit ... CouchDB and MongoDB I was perhaps not thinking so much what to "offer" but more in line of "marketing activities"... But this sounds good too. > The current website is kind of > stagnant, and needs a facelift. Apart from design, add more docs (how did it > go with the Javadoc->website idea Niclas?) Well, there are many aspects of it, right. 1. Generated javadoc, versioned, available online. 2. Extract package.html from sources and embed on pages. 3. Leave SV in favor of more statically generated site, editable and versioned via Git. > One of the main goals to me right now is to simplify the API/SPI (which I'm > doing Right Now), and also the REST part, since that would then make it > possible to create apps with a full Qi4j stack, and which is up-to-date with > regard to how apps should be written, in general. A bunch of the changes that are now flowing through are quite incompatible. Shall we bump to 2.0 in next release? Does such step slow us down too much, or shall we simply go for it, and if additional incompatibilities sail up we are not afraid to call it 3.0 if needed? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
