On 6/25/11 14:08 , Niclas Hedhman wrote:
An issue that is a little bit a sticking point, which would be great
to have a resolution for;
Association<Abc> abc();
REQUIRES that the containing type is an Entity. Could this be relaxed?
Why? Got example?
The only thing I can think of being an issue is whether the Visibility
rules will cause any problem in the type resolution on retrieval... I
think not, but devil in details...
The immutability of Value is still honored, since the Identity will be
used and not the pointed at entity.
So you're saying you want Values to be able to have Associations? If so,
it would basically have to be syntactic sugar for
Property<EntityReference>, and would require a running UoW in order to
be able to load the entity, or you're screwed.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
