On 7/1/11 14:06 , Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Yes, I think I agree that it was a mistake. Also try to recall that one thing that was considered at the time was to support Concerns on Property methods, and using Property subtypes was a path forward on that (although we never get to implement it).
I've added a trivial way to achieve that: there's a standard PropertyWrapper that you can instantiate in a Concern on Property methods, which you can subclass to do logging, notification, etc. Same with AssociationWrapper+ManyAssociationWrapper. Qi4j knows about this, so when doing e.g. getPropertyDescriptor(Property) it properly unwraps the property in order to get to the initial instance where the descriptor can be found.
/Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
