Rickard Öberg schrieb:
[snip]
No please, don't give up, Qi4j is important!
I'd be happy to help by working on extensions and libraries.
I'm working on an opensource project using Qi4j, maybe it could give some
visibility to it once/if it get some. If projects using Qi4j get
visibility,
Qi4j itself get some of it. What about a PoweredBy page on the site and a
"PoweredBy Qi4j" official logo? BTW, has the StreamFlow project been
finally
opensourced?
That would be nice! As it is, when people ask me about how many are
using Qi4j my answer is necessarily "I have no idea". I myself don't
know if this is all a waste of time, or if there is real interest in
these things from others than myself. Any feedback you can give here
really really helps.
A waste of time? Definitely not! For me it is a *great* help and fun to work
with. I've learned a lot from it. In the past I did business apps with
EJB/JBoss, my own OR-mapper, Hibernate, tried EMF but gave up on it. In fact for
me Qi4j is the only modelling solution for Java that does it *right*. I searched
but did not find any other.
The big point for me is that Qi4j lets me express the model (very rich one if
needed) right inside the code. Thats exactly what I need. I dont want tools that
get me away from the code and force me to express the model in a different
notation. There are enough impedance mismatches already.
So, thanks for this great piece of software.
Falko
--
Falko Bräutigam
http://polymap.org
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
